ISO Information and documentation — Records management is an international standard digitization of records; ISO – Information and documentation – Records management – Part 1: Concepts and principles; ISO/TR. ISO Information and documentation —. Records management —. Part 1: Concepts and principles. Information et documentation. The process of producing ISO Records Management is described, along the international standard ISO  and its associated Technical Report.
|Published (Last):||13 August 2006|
|PDF File Size:||5.4 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||10.13 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
ISO 15489 Records management
The standard establishes core concepts and principles for the creation, capture and management of records. Worldwide Standards We can source any standard from anywhere in the world. Ubiquitous computing power and nearly unlimited storage capacity are available to everyone. Several of us in the Editorial Group also argued strongly for a records continuum-inspired standard, in which the keeping of records is a continuous activity for a variety of reasons and with a variety of users than should be considered outside of constraints of time, place and custody.
Your basket is empty. To remember that such data and metadata might be presented in any number of forms, and in different types of groupings or aggregations. Information risk and governance officers Records managers Information managers IT managers Information security managers Enterprise architects Chief information officers Archivists, special librarians Knowledge management professionals Business administrators Legal advisors All individuals within organizations who are responsible for the oversight of record management and information governance practices Why should you use this standard?
Click to learn more. Leave a Reply Cancel reply Enter your comment here Many organizations are currently undertaking initiatives to improve information governance systems and practice across the business. Email required Address never made public. Machine learning, artificial intelligence are utilising massive volumes of data to train themselves to take over work and decision making formerly executed by people and organisations.
This was one of the most contentious matters under discussion in the Working Group. We intentionally avoided certain things in the revised Standard, in order to best achieve some of the goals we set for ourselves at the start. Often throughout the development process, we stopped to remind ourselves to think of records as data, whether structured to non-structured, along fecords their contextualising metadata, which also serves as a management tool over time.
Find Similar Items This product falls into the following categories. After a long and occasionally painful development process, bywe had arrived at a revised managemdnt of the Standard which was endorsed by our colleagues and published by ISO.
In this world, the analytical skills of understanding context and deciding how we want to create records in the first place, or how we make recofds about their management at critical points such as systems migrations, are vital.
We understood that our expertise is essential in a connected and information abundant world, with appraisal and access at the heart of our contribution. Rather, our preference was to develop a normative statement of what the work of keeping isp isand leave tests of quality or compliance to local or industry 14589-1 bodies. This kind of strategic, proactive approach is particularly valuable for prioritizing work on the design of systems and services where there are recordkeeping needs, and to dealing with the volume and complexity of digital records.
Crunch Time: The revised ISO and the future of recordkeeping – Cassie Findlay
In the revised ISO The standard was revised to ensure that it meets market requirements, keeps pace with the increasingly complex 15489-11 management requirements demanded by evolving digital environments and takes account of the wide range of related standards that have been issued since it was first published in This was a sobering thought, given the exponential rate of technological innovation that we are currently experiencing.
As I stress in presentations that I have delivered on the new Standard, the unfamiliarity of some of the ideas we present, and concerns about leaving behind some of our old methods can be challenging.
You are commenting using your WordPress. Thank you for this!
Metadata for records recorfs its criticality is stressed, and approaches to its design and management in line with existing advice in ISO [iv] are embedded throughout the document, in support of all aspects of making and managing records.
Skip to content Cassie Findlay. What form will the recordkeeping professional of the future take? Accept and continue Learn more about the cookies we use and how to change your settings. No doubt, the stakes were high. As we know in Australia, done regularly, the data that this type of appraisal gathers is essential to a properly functioning program for making and managing records — in any environment. Good records management is a fundamental element of good information governance and good business.
Bearing such observations in mind, we agreed that in developing the Standard, we needed to build a forward —looking document, being careful not to fall into the many traps of paper-based thinking. In other countries, our use of the term appraisal requires additional explanation and selling of the benefits of the kind of work we describe. Overview Product Details What is this standard about? This was the central standard in a suite of products on recordkeeping that had grown up in its wake since the issue of ISO Concepts and principles Status: In that time, a few attempts to do this revision had been mounted, only to collapse, perhaps under the weight of expectations.
Since its release inI have observed that reaction to the Standard has been an interesting mix of curiosity, positivity and, occasionally, confusion. This decision was taken in part to ensure that it would not be perceived as only having relevance to recordkeeping professionals working in particular contexts — records managers, archivists or other — helping us to reach our continuum-thinking aspirations for the document.
It had been formally adopted by over 50 nations and translated into 15 languages. Notify me of new comments via email. In some countries, the transition to digital business is still in early stages, and in these cases, reassurance must be given that while the new Standard is digital in mindset, it is still entirely applicable in paper based or hybrid environments.
The faster, easier way to work with standards. People and things are connected to the internet and to each other all the time.
All organizations will benefit from reviewing their record management activities against this standard. Complex tools and robots manatement only available to high tech industries and governments are available to people in their homes.